Author Topic: Scam Potential From a Display Bug  (Read 7914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« on: July 02, 2011, 06:02:08 PM »
0
"Take any size commodity deed and donate all but 1 of the commodity to a community collection like the brit library.  The commodity deed will still show the full amount of the resource, pre-donation, until server down.

This will be corrected if you try to redeem the commodity deed.

Donate mass resources to the brit library or vesper museum and then sell the deeds for huge amounts of gold.  Double dipping never felt so good."
« Last Edit: August 22, 2011, 07:20:19 PM by Newsman »

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2011, 10:16:06 AM »
0
here's a question, does this fool the turn in system? can you double dip the system?

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2012, 01:07:17 PM »
0
Anyone ever play with this bug?

Offline TrailMyx

  • Officially retired from UO
  • Administrator
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 13302
  • Activity:
    0.2%
  • Reputation Power: 154
  • TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!TrailMyx is awe-inspiring!
  • Gender: Male
  • Viper!
  • Respect: +1349
  • Referrals: 33
    • View Profile
    • ScriptUO
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2012, 02:53:27 PM »
0
Did you try to turn in the same one again?  Would be interesting to create an infinite amount of resources...
Please read the ScriptUO site RULES
Come play RIFT with me!

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2012, 03:29:59 PM »
0
Cant double down, as per bodfather.  As this bug has also been reported to me by some folks recently, I am making this public.

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2012, 03:31:04 PM »
0
This bug is now approved for all audiences.

Offline smokinjoe26

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 1
  • smokinjoe26 has no influence.
  • Respect: +1
  • Referrals: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2012, 11:12:42 AM »
0
"Take any size commodity deed and donate all but 1 of the commodity to a community collection like the brit library.  The commodity deed will still show the full amount of the resource, pre-donation, until server down.

This will be corrected if you try to redeem the commodity deed.

Donate mass resources to the brit library or vesper museum and then sell the deeds for huge amounts of gold.  Double dipping never felt so good."


Is the buyer of the Commodity deed getting only one item?  Or is OSI basically "re-stocking" the Deed?

Did you try to turn in the same one again?  Would be interesting to create an infinite amount of resources...

I hope I'm not asking the same question again ... but I do have 2 OSI accounts and access to quite a few more, if you catch my drift?

Offline smokinjoe26

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 1
  • smokinjoe26 has no influence.
  • Respect: +1
  • Referrals: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2012, 11:14:19 AM »
0
sorry, just read the name of the room and acutally processed the info this time.  it is a scam and only one item from the incorrectly labelled deed.  let me know if this is incorrect.

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2012, 12:15:01 PM »
0
It's a bug with scam potential, not a scam.

Please re-read the bug.

Offline _C2_

  • AFK FtW
  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4077
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 48
  • _C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!_C2_ has great potential!
  • RIP Pen Trick
  • Respect: +254
  • Referrals: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2012, 03:21:05 PM »
0
I always feel bad when I read this bug.   :(

Offline NewsmanTopic starter

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 8
  • Newsman has no influence.
  • Respect: +38
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2012, 02:28:59 PM »
0
Not at all bugs were created equal.

Offline Xanderyum

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • Xanderyum has no influence.
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +9
  • Referrals: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Scam Potential From a Display Bug
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2012, 12:00:23 PM »
0
found this awhile ago also, but last time i checked it, was fixed on OSI. Can someone verify?

Tags: