ScriptUO
Scripting Resources & Utilities => Stealth Client => Stealth archive => Topic started by: Drabadan on November 01, 2013, 02:06:23 AM
-
looking for someone, to ask about many things.
I'm very very noob at programming but made a few scripts on Delphi.
Maybe someone wants to share some expirience on that!
Currently having very bad issues with my Internet connection, so i can't post any script this far, but hoping that today-tommorow all the issues would be solved!
Anyways - hello there everybody! hoping for warm company to talk about!
P.S. By the way - i couldn't find the tutorial for using Delphi with Stealth, is it just my problem of findingEngine in my brain or it doesn't exist here at all?
-
Examples :
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=146.0
and
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=147.0
API Documentation and Tons of help in Russian forums here :
http://stealth.od.ua
-
Examples :
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=146.0
and
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=147.0
API Documentation and Tons of help in Russian forums here :
http://stealth.od.ua
thanks for your reply... no one scripts on delphi ok :)
-
Examples :
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=146.0
and
http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=147.0
API Documentation and Tons of help in Russian forums here :
http://stealth.od.ua
thanks for your reply... no one scripts on delphi ok :)
This is wrong ;)
I myself work as Delphi developer irl. Back then when i were a simple Stealth user i wrote code in Pascal\Delphi. Dx writing code in pascal here.
Introduce your self at our forum here :http://www.scriptuo.com/index.php?board=20.0
Then ask specific Questions, we will try to help you as much as possibkle :)
-
Nope. Not a single person!
Just going to leave this here though...
Object Pascal refers to a branch of object-oriented derivatives of Pascal, mostly known as the primary programming language of Embarcadero Delphi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_programming_language
(http://puu.sh/55wOT.png)
-
It's OK to post source code and projects, but please remember to remove the executable.
-
It's OK to post source code and projects, but please remember to remove the executable.
there is a problem with my eyes i can't see any of attachements... :)
Source codes will be posted a little bit later...
thought to post it but it's a real crap code, so...
-
You have to post and introduction to become unrestricted. Once unrestricted, you can see attachments.
-
It's OK to post source code and projects, but please remember to remove the executable.
Posting Compiled Script as standalone, not allowed?
-
It's OK to post source code and projects, but please remember to remove the executable.
Posting Compiled Script as standalone, not allowed?
I'm going to say it's not allowed because of the chance for virus in the executable. We don't have time as admins to check every submission for viruses. Hope that makes sense.
Serious scripters can easily compile the code to create a working executable.
The only thing I think should be allowed are .exe and .dll files that are directly related to the core of the scripting platform.
There are online virus scanners such as:
https://www.virustotal.com/
For Malware:
http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/bacef5b3ce5d6604bd0bce890c75b740e3b16f2d
And checksum utilities:
http://onlinemd5.com/
There's many of these, and if you have better suggestions, please post them.
P.S. The executable posted by Drabadan showed a virus by Comodo.....
SHA256: 2c2ff8e98cbee32cd9a8d692e4701ae81d6bbedcb471beebd5f81f4a92ce2839
File name: Craft Handling.rar
Detection ratio: 1 / 46
Analysis date: 2013-11-02 21:24:07 UTC ( 6 minutes ago )
0
0
More details
Analysis
Additional information
Comments
Votes
Antivirus Result Update
Agnitum 20131102
AhnLab-V3 20131102
AntiVir 20131102
Antiy-AVL 20131101
Avast 20131102
AVG 20131102
Baidu-International 20131102
BitDefender 20131102
Bkav 20131102
ByteHero 20131028
CAT-QuickHeal 20131102
ClamAV 20131102
Commtouch 20131102
Comodo ApplicUnwnt.Win32.Hoax.ArchSMS.BGKQ 20131102
DrWeb 20131102
Emsisoft 20131102
ESET-NOD32 20131102
F-Prot 20131102
F-Secure 20131102
Fortinet 20131102
GData 20131102
Ikarus 20131102
Jiangmin 20131102
K7AntiVirus 20131101
K7GW 20131101
Kaspersky 20131101
Kingsoft 20130829
Malwarebytes 20131102
McAfee 20131102
McAfee-GW-Edition 20131102
Microsoft 20131102
MicroWorld-eScan 20131028
NANO-Antivirus 20131102
Norman 20131102
nProtect 20131101
Panda 20131102
Rising 20131101
Sophos 20131102
SUPERAntiSpyware 20131102
Symantec 20131102
TheHacker 20131029
TotalDefense 20131101
TrendMicro 20131102
TrendMicro-HouseCall 20131102
VBA32 20131101
VIPRE 20131102
ViRobot 20131102
-
Oh yeah i forgot that people could implement bad software components into their projects...
But this also could be a false report.
Well its a bit Sad, that we are forced to take such precautions because there could be a few reasons sharing the compiled exe :
- No view on the code wanted
- No requirements of VS\Delphi or whatever IDE + required runtimes
- No experience required
on the other side if someone would be really such bad person he could :
- Gain Control over your Data
- Gain Control over your Computer
- Manipulate your Computer
- Destroy Data
-
Oh... I'm very sorry to post a malware. I realy didn't want to do it.
Trailmyx thanx for telling about all of these rules!
-
Yeh, it's very annoying for sure. There are those that may not be aware that they might infect someone by a trojan or some other virus by sharing an executable on their computer. But as you point out there are others that explicitly implement nefarious code in their "script" to do all kinds of bad things.
That's kinda why I want to look into updating ScriptUO to allow for people to load a .cs file into the editor, and have it compile and run. At least there you can see if there is any evil code embedded.
With .net, one could use .net reflector to look at the assembly, but it's pretty easy to hide, compress or obfuscate the code to get around that.
From my viewpoint, I'd be pissed if someone got a virus by running items acquired at this site.
-
Oh... I'm very sorry to post a malware. I realy didn't want to do it.
Trailmyx thanx for telling about all of these rules!
No worries. We're kinda developing new rules as we understand how to share work in Stealth. I'd love to be able to allow for executables, but that just opens up a whole bad can of worms. Perhaps we'll figure out a better way to share work in Stealth without running the risk of bricking your computer. ;)
-
Yeh, it's very annoying for sure. There are those that may not be aware that they might infect someone by a trojan or some other virus by sharing an executable on their computer. But as you point out there are others that explicitly implement nefarious code in their "script" to do all kinds of bad things.
That's kinda why I want to look into updating ScriptUO to allow for people to load a .cs file into the editor, and have it compile and run. At least there you can see if there is any evil code embedded.
With .net, one could use .net reflector to look at the assembly, but it's pretty easy to hide, compress or obfuscate the code to get around that.
From my viewpoint, I'd be pissed if someone got a virus by running items acquired at this site.
That could be a great Contribution, and i understand your point :)
-
Oh... I'm very sorry to post a malware. I realy didn't want to do it.
Trailmyx thanx for telling about all of these rules!
No worries. We're kinda developing new rules as we understand how to share work in Stealth. I'd love to be able to allow for executables, but that just opens up a whole bad can of worms. Perhaps we'll figure out a better way to share work in Stealth without running the risk of bricking your computer. ;)
Restrict usage until someone approve it. But this is a stupid idea because it requires people to put their time and computer on the line to approve something what also could do something hidden.
Like you test an app and it seems to be clear and not a scam, and later on community crys because they lost stuff.. No i wouldnt do that.
-
Restrict usage until someone approve it. But this is a stupid idea because it requires people to put their time and computer on the line to approve something what also could do something hidden.
Like you test an app and it seems to be clear and not a scam, and later on community crys because they lost stuff.. No i wouldnt do that.
Yeh, I don't want to over-complicate the site and its administration. The admins, GMODs and MODs volunteer their time (and I greatly appreciate the effort), but it's really pretty simple to run the site because it's so hands off for me and others. But when it starts sounds like "a job" is when I start to lose interest.
We'll figure something out.